Five 1.7B role specialists fine-tuned from LFM3-1.7B-Base

#28
by SkyIsNotGreen - opened

Hello,

I've been working on Hive, a local harness for role-specialized models. I fine-tuned five 1.7B models from LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-Base. Each one covers a different seat in the harness instead of trying to be a general chat model.

Collection: Hive series
Harness: sky-is-green/hive

The five models are:

The scores come from my held-out role suites with greedy decoding. The GGUF rows use Q4_K_M. Each task family has 38 to 77 examples; I put the task files, checkers and eval records in the repo.

Hive runs a loop: solve, detect, repair, escalate. The seats fail in different ways, so I trained one small model for each one. A 1.7B model is cheap enough that I can keep several loaded on one workstation, even alongside a 27b-class generative model, and the checkers give me a signal that doesn't rely on it being there.

The five seats do different jobs. The Conductor assigns work, respects capacity and dependency constraints, and produces an ordered plan with risks. The Reader extracts invoice or contract fields, or answers only from a supplied passage. The Auditor fits a model into vRAM/KV budgets, or validates a proposed assignment, schedule or order. The Dispatcher assigns jobs to workers and returns a dependency, or deadline-aware schedule. The Tool Manager chooses the right tool and orders multi-tool calls before an agent runs them.

I used synthetic data that passed deterministic checkers, with no user data, and trained them on one 20 GB AMD card. I released merged Transformers checkpoints plus Q4_K_M GGUF files, and added a use-cases section with concrete examples to each model card.

I'm sharing this because I think narrow role fine-tunes are a useful pattern for local models. I'd like feedback on the role boundaries and the eval design. I'm also happy to share the data-generation, LoRA and GGUF recipes.

I should be clear about the limits. These are independent community fine-tunes, not LiquidAI releases. They are role specialists, not chat models. The numbers are from my own held-out suites, not a general claim about model quality. For open conversation, use the LFM3 base or instruct model.

I'm releasing them as derivatives of LiquidAI/LFM3-1.7B-Base under the LFM Open License v1.0. Commercial use by an entity above USD 10M annual revenue is not licensed under LFM 1.0. The base model is by Liquid AI.

Thanks for releasing it!

Sign up or log in to comment